<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Dancing About Architecture: Microfeed for "RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0 vs. Atom"</title>
    <link>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000239.html</link>
    <description>Comments and trackbacks for the entry "RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0 vs. Atom"</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>eric@burningdoor.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>eric@burningdoor.com</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 12:39:01 CDT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>RSS</category>
    <generator>Movable Type v3.14</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title>RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 2.0 vs. Atom</title>
      <link>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000239.html</link>
      <description>I&apos;ve been asked a few times (no really, I have!) where I stand with the whole RSS-RDF-Atom religous war. There&apos;s a very contentious history there, with some strong personalities that have made the domain of content syndication more polarized than perhaps it could have been. I&apos;d really like to stay above the politics and look at the different specs from a technologist&apos;s viewpoint... so that&apos;s what I&apos;m going to try to do here....</description>
      <comments>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000239.html</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:16:29 CDT</pubDate>
      <source url="http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/index.xml">Dancing About Architecture</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      
      <title>Comment from dick</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>an invaluable comparison and discussion of the specs and where the holes are. nice job. this really helped put some missing pieces of the puzzle together for me.</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#c92</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 07:24:59 CDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from "Atom的威力"</title>
      <link>http://blog.serv.idv.tw/archives/000132.php</link>
      <description>在Jedi的文章裡看到有關MT 2.65的消息，不過在考慮要不要升級之前，我得先看看「加入Atom模版」這個新功能，夠不夠吸引我。 跟著Jedi提拱的連結去看，對Atom這個玩意有點了解了，看似RSS的東...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#p12</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2003 05:03:09 CDT</pubDate>
      
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from "Atom的威力"</title>
      <link>http://blog.serv.idv.tw/archives/000132.php</link>
      <description>在Jedi的文章裡看到有關MT 2.65的消息，不過在考慮要不要升級之前，我得先看看「加入Atom模版」這個新功能，夠不夠吸引我。 跟著Jedi提供的連結去看，對Atom這個玩意有點了解了，看似RSS的東...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#p15</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:27:06 CDT</pubDate>
      
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from "Applause, Applause"</title>
      <link>http://tim.geekheim.de/archive/000590.html</link>
      <description>Beeing a geek and blogger I am following the discussions around the evolving syndication standards quite closely without getting myself too much into debate. The RSS 1.0 vs. 2.0 war was already dirty enough. For my own part, I can say I am clear suppor...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#p18</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:22:35 CDT</pubDate>
      
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from "you say rss, I say atom"</title>
      <link>http://backlon.com/archives/000134.html</link>
      <description>What&apos;s the deal with atom? I could upgrade to the latest MT install and get an atom feed thereby (&quot;thereby&quot; is the word of the day.) All I know about atom is that the folks over at Scripting News don&apos;t much like it. Every time I search for info on it I...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#p23</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:59:49 CDT</pubDate>
      
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from "El granelero pasa (11)"</title>
      <link>http://www.teaser.fr/~lcolombet/empyree/dotclear/?2004/12/15/421-el-granelero-pasa-11</link>
      <description>Petite leon d?abstraction : On ne fait pas les sites pour les validateurs, mais pour les visiteurs. On ne les fait pas non plus pour les moteurs de recherche et encore moins pour les navigateurs (suivez mon regard?). Non, on fait un site pour...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#p132</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:41:50 CDT</pubDate>
      
    </item>
    <item>
      
      <title>Comment from ilya</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>this page looks broken in my firefox on linux, 1024x768</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">239@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#c6224</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 12:39:01 CDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>