<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Dancing About Architecture: Microfeed for "Using P2P for RSS Distribution"</title>
    <link>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000288.html</link>
    <description>Comments and trackbacks for the entry "Using P2P for RSS Distribution"</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor>eric@burningdoor.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>eric@burningdoor.com</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:24:56 CDT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>RSS</category>
    <category>The Net</category>
    <generator>Movable Type v3.14</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title>Using P2P for RSS Distribution</title>
      <link>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000288.html</link>
      <description>As more and more people wake up to the idea that a fundamentally polling-based RSS distribution model might have some &quot;scaling challenges&quot;, different ideas to handle this come to the fore. Here&apos;s an interesting model: using the BitTorrent peer-to-peer infrastructure to distribute RSS feeds. BitTorrent is a cool bit of engineering that solves the &quot;Tragedy of the Commons&quot; problem that plagues many p2p protocols: you gotta pay (i.e., offer some upstream bandwidth) to play (download). The Java-based client Azureus is my client of choice, but it&apos;s really the protocol that&apos;s the smart stuff here. Getting back to how this works with RSS, I personally think this is overkill for the scaling issues at present: I think getting the clients and server-side aggregators/publishers to agree on a push protocol and transport is a more pressing concern. I think the P2P idea is a good thing to keep in our pocket when RSS starts getting bulkier. BitTorrent and RSS Create Disruptive Revolution...</description>
      <comments>http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000288.html</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">288@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:20:55 CDT</pubDate>
      <source url="http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/index.xml">Dancing About Architecture</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      
      <title>Comment from Peter</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I also think the BitTorrent angle for feeds is not (yet) necessary. But what you guys could do: change the syndication frequency dynamically.<br />
E.g. if your polling of a source feed shows it only changes twice a week on average, you could add an updatePeriod/updateFrequency to the burned feed that tells RSS aggregators to update daily instead of hourly. <a href="http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/</a><br />
This would drop the traffic you guys are getting (to 1/24). You could also decide to only poll the source feed once per X hours instead of every 60 minutes.</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">288@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#c2099</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:51:40 CDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      
      <title>Comment from Randy Charles Morin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Oh! Oh! RSS is broken again!</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">288@http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/#c5674</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:24:56 CDT</pubDate>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>