You Always Start the Last Company
There is an old saying that the Military always fights the last war, and I think the same holds true in many respects for entrepreneurs. Armed with "lessons learned" from the last endeavor, successful or not, entrepreneurs dive into the next effort reminding themselves to make sure they don't XYZ this time. This is one of the reasons I like having a Board of Directors, as the board can act as a rudder in many ways, making sure you don't veer too far off course in your effort not to repeat past mistakes.
Two companies ago, we all felt we hired a sales executive too soon, and in our last company, Spyonit, determined not to ramp sales until it was time, we waited too long. After feeling like too many enterprise software deals slowed us down in a previous company, we entered FeedBurner with the mantra "no enterprise deals". I can think of countless examples.
None of this is to say that these lessons learned are necessarily bad or wrong, they're just the lessons that might be more aptly applied to restarting the previous company, not necessarily the right lessons for this new company in this new environment in this different economy. This is one of the great challenges in providing advice to entrepreneurs and startups. You might be very good at helping them build version 2.0 of the company you just built, but the advice may be wholly inappropriate to what anybody else is getting ready to do.
Are there any lessons we've learned that I think are appropriate to any new company? Yes, I can think of a couple right off the bat.....and after another twenty minutes I thought of a third.....I still wonder whether these are truly appropriate to any new company or just abstractions that make sense for a certain class of companies, but what the heck, here they are:
Lesson One: At some point in the company's first two years, the executive team needs to become passionate about revenue. This may seem obvious to the point of inviting ridicule, but there's a difference between "concerned about revenue" and "passionate about revenue".. In the first year or two of the company's life, the passion has to be almost single-minded around the product or service. There is then a transition in which the management team needs to *also* become passionate about the customer, and then finally *also* passionate about revenue. Some people are revenue animals and some aren't. If you're founding a company and you're not a revenue animal, then you need to understand that you should bring somebody in to run the company who is a revenue animal at some point. It's no fun trying to run a company as CEO if you're passionate about the product but you wish the Board would stop freaking out just because you missed the numbers last quarter. If the executive team is only concerned about revenue, that's not good enough.
Lesson Two: It is easier to not start spending one new dollar in expenses this month than it is to stop spending one existing dollar of expenses next month. This is true for travel, infrastructure, marketing, development tools, web services like salesforce.com, on and on. If you engender a strong sense of capital efficiency in the company, it's much easier to KEEP spending under control than it is to GET spending under control.
Lesson Three: Goals, not competitors. When you focus on your company's goals, you are focusing on something you have control over, you make strong decisions, and everybody knows what success looks like. When you obsess about your competitors, you are focusing on something over which you don't have control, you make bad decisions, and nobody is sure what success looks like, since the company's actions are in reaction to a third party. Being fiercely competitive is fine, you can hate that your competitors are performing better than you, and you can be hyper-paranoid about what might happen to your business, but the best way to compete in the market is to focus on those things you can strive toward independent of what anybody else does. While this point may sound like motherhood and apple pie, in reality, it can be extremely challenging because everybody else (the media, your mom, customers, vendors, etc.) are looking at the landscape and constantly commenting that X is doing this and you're not, or X is gaining market share from you, etc. So, clearly some part of creating goals is going to be based in market realities, and some part of market realities is going to be driven by existing and emergent competitors. Nonetheless, I am confident that nobody understands where or when their ultimate competition will emerge, and by obsessing about existing competitors instead of clearly defined goals, you make it that much easier for the unforeseen competitor to swoop in and bonk you in the head with the Mallet of Justice(tm).
Comments
“Even in the fact of massive competition, don’t think about the competition. Literally don’t think about them. Every time you’re in a meeting and you’re tempted to talk about a competitor, replace that thought with one about user feedback or surveys. Just think about the customer.”
– Mike McCue, CEO Tellme Networks, Former VP of Technology Netscape
Posted by: Nivi | April 20, 2007 07:57 PM
Great post Dick.
I have the following quote from Matt Blumberg, Founder & CEO, Return Path on my "competitors" doc: "You can never be paranoid enough about the competition. Assume they're all out to get you at every turn, that they're smarter, richer, quicker, and better looking than you are. Live in fear of them eating your lunch."
To that, I will now add the tempering quote from your post.
Keep 'em coming. Thanks
Posted by: Arun | April 21, 2007 08:51 AM
sweet quote, nivi. the third goal is crucial, for sure...
Posted by: danny | April 21, 2007 07:07 PM
The revenue animal changes just about everything in the company and almost always for the better. Early on at Amazon.com we had what was often referred to as "the largest and most talented retailing editorial staff in the world". They were amazing, and their CVs were awe-inspiring. This led to unbelievably good reviews, email and the like. Correctly, Jeff focused on the product (customer experience) to the neglect of just about everything else. As we started to focus on revenue (or, 'profitability', in this case) we had to start assessing every expense with brutal judgment. We quickly found that customer reviews often performed just as well, or better, than company reviews. There are many reasons for that... one is that they appear to be unbiased but another may be that they're just as good as in-house reviews, and they more quickly reflect the content that buying customers are looking for (and the questions they have). In any case, there are hundreds of those types of examples from the days of transition to profitability, and I agree that it took an entirely different mindset to make that transition.
Great post,
Dave
Posted by: Dave Schappell | April 22, 2007 09:30 AM